Phase-0 Microdosing Operations
Comparison of Phase-0 Microdosing Operations with Traditional Phase-1 Approaches
Phase-0 microdosing operations have many similar features to traditional Phase-1 programs. However, Phase-0 approaches are usually shorter, smaller, quicker, and therefore cheaper to run. Phase-0 Microdosing operations are primarily defined by the sub-therapeutic exposures to the test drug. This means the exposure is safer than traditional approaches, but also that research participants cannot expect therapeutic benefit. This has ethical, methodological, and technological implications.
Table 1
The table is adapted from: Burt T, Yoshida K, Lappin G, Vuong L, John C, et al. 2016. Microdosing and other Phase-0 Clinical Trials: Facilitating Translation in Drug Development. Clinical and Translational Science 9:74-88.
Comparison of Phase-0 Microdosing Operations with Traditional Phase-1 Approaches.
Therapeutic intent
None
Possible
Study of systemic tolerability
None
Yes
Proof of Mechanism
Possible (e.g., PET receptor binding and displacement)
Possible
Preclinical Package
Limited, variable; depends on extent of exposure to the test article and experimental goals
Full requirements
- in-vitro Models
Full requirement
Full requirements
- Toxicology
Limited, variable
Full requirements
- Genotoxicology
None or limited
Full requirements
GMP
Flexible, depending on available preclinical information and route of administration (e.g., sterility ensured for IV route)
Full requirements
Regulatory Review
30-day
30-day
Cost of Program
$ 0.5-0.75 M
$ 1.5-2.5 M
Comparison of Phase-0 Microdosing Operations with Traditional Phase-1 Approaches. | ||
---|---|---|
Phase-0/Microdosing (eIND, ICH M3 guideline) | Traditional Phase-1 (IND) | |
Therapeutic intent | None | Possible |
Proof of Mechanism | Possible (e.g., PET receptor binding and displacement) | Possible |
Preclinical Package | Limited, variable; depends on extent of exposure to the test article and experimental goals | Full requirements |
- in-vitro Models | Full requirement | Full requirements |
- Toxicology | Limited, variable | Full requirements |
- Genotoxicology | None or limited | Full requirements |
GMP | Flexible, depending on available preclinical information and route of administration (e.g., sterility ensured for IV route) | Full requirements |
Regulatory Review | 30-day | 30-day |
Usual Duration of Program | 4-12 months | 12-24 months |
Cost of Program | $ 0.5-0.75 M | $ 1.5-2.5 M |
Studies
- Duration (per Participant)
1-14 days*
6-60 days*
- Number of Study Sites
Single
Single/Multiple
- Maximal Dose
<MTD
MTD
- Population
Healthy volunteers or patients
Vulnerable populations
Mostly healthy volunteers (unless toxicity risk is high, e.g., in oncology trials)
* - on Average, Could Be Longer with Longer Half-life Drugs; Mtd – Maximum Tolerated Dose
Studies | ||
---|---|---|
- Size (Typical) | 4-10 participants | 6-30 participants |
- Duration (per Participant) | 1-14 days* | 6-60 days* |
- Number of Study Sites | Single | Single/Multiple |
- Maximal Dose | <MTD | MTD |
- Exposure | Limited | Multiple doses allowed |
- Population | Healthy volunteers or patients Vulnerable populations | Mostly healthy volunteers (unless toxicity risk is high, e.g., in oncology trials) |
* - on Average, Could Be Longer with Longer Half-life Drugs; Mtd – Maximum Tolerated Dose |